Sinus augmentation via transcrestal approach: a comparison between the balloon and osteotome technique in a cadaver study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND The transcrestal approach with osteotomes is a commonly applied and predictable technique for maxillary sinus floor elevation. However, Schneiderian membrane perforation is a common and often inevitable intraoperative complication. Recently, the use of balloons has been proposed to reduce the risk of sinus membrane perforation and to facilitate the surgical technique. The aim of this study was to determine membrane elevation height and perforation rate using the transcrestal balloon technique (B) and a conventional osteotome approach, as control (C). METHODS Ten fresh, completely edentulous cadaver heads (seven male and three female) were selected. In a split-mouth design, each sinus was randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control technique. Pre-surgical planning was aided by cone-beam computed tomography. During the procedure, an endoscope was used to monitor the elevation procedure and the occurrence of sinus perforation. The elevation continued until either 15 mm (measured from the alveolar crest) was reached or a perforation occurred. The residual ridge and the elevated membrane height were measured and compared with the paired Student's t-test. Presence of sinus perforation was recorded at three cutoff points: 10, 12, and 15 mm. RESULTS The mean age of the specimens was 77.7 ± 14.2 years (range 49-92). The mean initial, final, and elevated sinus membrane height for the B group was 5.3 ± 1.9, 13.7 ± 1.9, and 8.3 ± 3.1 mm, whereas the correspondent values for the C group were 5.1 ± 2.1, 13.2 ± 2.8, and 8.1 ± 3.1 mm. The incidence of sinus perforation, using 10, 12, and 15 mm as end points was 0%, 22.2%, and 44.4% in the B group, whereas in the C group the respective values were 10.0%, 20.0%, and 50.0%. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for all the above-mentioned variables. In addition, mean residual ridge height was not significantly different between the non-perforation and perforation sites in the B group (5.2 ± 2.2 and 5.5 ± 1.7 mm) and in the C group (5.2 ± 2.5 and 5.0 ± 2.0 mm). Three cadavers had perforations in both sinuses, accounting for 66.6% of total number of perforations. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this study, the balloon and the conventional osteotome approach are comparable in terms of perforation rate as it relates to the elevation height. Also, the amount of residual alveolar bone was not related to the incidence of perforation and the height of sinus elevation.
منابع مشابه
Coalescence of inter: Osteotomy bone graft material inserted via separate transcrestal sinus osteotomies: A case report and concise review of the literature
When multiple implants are to be placed, and a pneumatized sinus exists, the published reports suggest that the lateral window approach (LWA) is favored for sinus floor augmentation. Simultaneously, if a transcrestal sinus floor augmentation has been carried out (bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation), the reports are restricted to single implant placement at any site. The aim of this stud...
متن کاملFlapless Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: computer guided implant surgery combined with expanding-condensing osteotomes protocol.
PURPOSE A novel technique for transcrestal guided sinus lift elevation (TGSL), is described underlining the step by step surgical protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS TGSL modified osteotome technique was planned by the NobelProcera(®) Software Planning Programm (Nobel Guide, Nobel Biocare AB) and performed by stereolitographic template. The depth of the planned osteotomy was determined precisely ...
متن کاملComplications with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: etiology, prevention, and treatment
The combination of postextraction ridge resorption [1] and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus [2, 3] often limits the bone available for implant placement in the posterior maxilla. Fortunately, the lateral and transcrestal approaches to sinus floor elevation (SFE) and augmentation can reproduce adequate subantral bone volumes for implant-supported rehabilitation in this region. The lateral w...
متن کاملFlapless approach to maxillary sinus augmentation using minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation.
In the atrophic posterior maxilla, successful implant placement is often complicated by the lack of quality and volume of available bone. In these cases, sinus floor augmentation is recommended to gain sufficient bone around the implants. Sinus elevation can be performed by either an open lateral window approach or by a closed osteotome approach depending on available bone height. This case ser...
متن کاملRetrieval of Displaced Implant Attributable to an Ill-Fitting Denture From the Maxillary Sinus Six Months After Transcrestal Sinus Floor Augmentation and Implant Placement
Introduction: Asymptomatic displacement of dental implants into the maxillary sinus after a transcrestal sinus augmentation is a rare complication that can occur when there is poor bone quality and minimal residual bone height. Patient compliance with postoperative appointments and failure to comply with denture-wearing instructions are critical contributing factors. To the best of the authors’...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical oral implants research
دوره 24 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013